All due respect AnthonyT, but we're not all born with that kind of commitment. While I certainly both respect and appreciate the true "Die-hards", (and have more then once been in a dillema about dilluting the membership of different hard-core, tight groups with "newbies"), I'm not sure if influx of careful, calculating members is
such a bad thing.
"Do or die" members are a blessing and a curse - they join up easily and their plans are grandiose - but their lack of foresight often makes them quit soon after they realize the actual difficulties and commitment to the activities.
In respect to rally, I'm hoping that my gradual and careful approach - phased commitment if you will:) -- will enable me to enter the sport in a controlled manner and enjoy it increasingly for years to come

. I don't quite appreciate the sentiment that I should just pack up and leave (i.e. "your homebody kind isn't
welcome here") just because I'd like to start things a little bit closer to home - if possible; especially prior to ever actually experiencing the event -- I think informed commitment beats reckless 'commitment' every time;).
In short - asking
potential participants and newbies to commit to unknown, may bring few willing participants, even fewer in the long run, and arguably their willingness for uninformed sacrifice and zealous behaviour may not actually beneft the community in the long run.
In the end, some compromise is inevitable for any organized activity to grow its base...
....... besides, you can only expect spoiled Torontians to assume every activity would revolve around our residence 8)

--------
In the end, I'm personally definitelly interested (and so's at least one of my friends), but I wouldn't sign a participation contract until I know where/when/how...